EVIDENCE-BASED FORESTRY IN FINLAND

Questions related to sustainability of the forestry sector

  • SuomiSuomi
  • EnglishEnglish
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Follow @NPMetsa
  • Home
  • What is EBFF?
  • Reviews
    • Effects of forest management on biodiversity
    • Value of small habitat patches for biodiversity
    • Ecosystem services valuation
    • Forest habitats and Natura
  • Publications
  • News
  • Contact
  • Suomi
You are here: Home / General / First stakeholder meeting

First stakeholder meeting

24.8.2018

The material is available in Finnish here.

Runner’s high is a concept that many people are familiar with. Lot less is talked about researcher’s high. But there is no better word to describe the euphoric feeling I had when we finished our first stakeholder meeting yesterday on species recovery after harvesting and how different harvesting models influence biodiversity.

Before the workshop I was worried that maybe I had overbudgeted time for discussion. As it turns out the time allocation was just right. Discussion was active throughout the day and plenty of interesting points were made from defining concepts to potential factors creating heterogeneity in the results. Plenty to chew on when we continue to further develop the systematic review protocol. Thank you, all the participants!

Once finalized, the research protocol will be available for public consultation in this website. We will also organize other workshops during this fall and warmly welcome everyone who wants to attend. If you are interested and our first invitation did not reach you, please let Sini know.

Tweet

Systematic review and map

What is a Systematic Review?
A Systematic Review collates, critically appraises, and synthesizes all available evidence relevant to a question. Reviewers use pre-defined methods to minimize bias and thus provide more reliable findings that could inform decision making.

What is a Systematic Map?
A Systematic Map collates, codes, and configures all available evidence relevant to a question. Reviewers use pre-defined methods to minimize bias and assess the extent of the evidence to provide a basis that could inform further research and synthesis.

Source: Collaboration for Environmental Evidence.

Reviews

  • Effects of forest management on biodiversity
  • Value of small habitat patches for biodiversity
  • Ecosystem services valuation
  • Forest habitats and Natura

News

Updated information concerning the project is posted in the News. In this section you may also find information of the events.

News and events

Hunting for grey literature

1.2.2019

One of the significant differences between a systematic and non-systematic (i.e. traditional) literature review is that during a systematic review process information is searched also within grey literature that has not been peer-reviewed. In … Lue lisää...

Insights from the stakeholder workshop guide the review

9.11.2018

In our second stakeholder workshop we moved from the impacts of different forest management regimes to conservation practices used in production forests. There was a balanced participation from different stakeholder groups, and the discussion around … Lue lisää...

What do we mean when we talk about evidence?

2.10.2018

At the first stakeholder workshop we got a question about the name of the project, specifically on the use of the word evidence. Based on the discussion that followed, evidence and evidence-based are words that are understood in multiple ways. For a … Lue lisää...

More articles

For more information

Contact information, Metsäteho Oy


The Finnish Forest Foundation is funding the Evidence-Based Forestry in Finland project.

Copyright© 2022 Metsäteho Oy