EVIDENCE-BASED FORESTRY IN FINLAND

Questions related to sustainability of the forestry sector

  • SuomiSuomi
  • EnglishEnglish
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Follow @NPMetsa
  • Home
  • What is EBFF?
  • Reviews
    • Effects of forest management on biodiversity
    • Value of small habitat patches for biodiversity
    • Ecosystem services valuation
    • Forest habitats and Natura
    • Ecosystem services vs. wood sales
    • Barriers for fish passage
    • Water protection and forestry
    • Sustainability image of forestry
    • Water impacts of peatland forestry
    • Drivers of certification
    • Climate change and boreal forest species
  • Publications
  • News
  • Contact
  • Suomi
You are here: Home / Archives for General

Hunting for grey literature

1.2.2019

One of the significant differences between a systematic and non-systematic (i.e. traditional) literature review is that during a systematic review process information is searched also within grey literature that has not been peer-reviewed. In practice this means looking for studies using internet … [Read more...]

Insights from the stakeholder workshop guide the review

9.11.2018

In our second stakeholder workshop we moved from the impacts of different forest management regimes to conservation practices used in production forests. There was a balanced participation from different stakeholder groups, and the discussion around the topic was lively and respectful. What more can … [Read more...]

What do we mean when we talk about evidence?

2.10.2018

At the first stakeholder workshop we got a question about the name of the project, specifically on the use of the word evidence. Based on the discussion that followed, evidence and evidence-based are words that are understood in multiple ways. For a person evidence-based refers to someone who has … [Read more...]

Funding received from the Finnish Forest Foundation

11.9.2018

In a project that emphasises transparency in conducting research, it would be odd not to follow the same code of conduct in matters related to the project. Hence, we announce that the project has received funding from the Finnish Forest Foundation. The funding is for a year and started in August … [Read more...]

First stakeholder meeting

24.8.2018

Runner’s high is a concept that many people are familiar with. Lot less is talked about researcher’s high. But there is no better word to describe the euphoric feeling I had when we finished our first stakeholder meeting yesterday on species recovery after harvesting and how different harvesting … [Read more...]

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »

Systematic review and map

What is a Systematic Review?
A Systematic Review collates, critically appraises, and synthesizes all available evidence relevant to a question. Reviewers use pre-defined methods to minimize bias and thus provide more reliable findings that could inform decision making.

What is a Systematic Map?
A Systematic Map collates, codes, and configures all available evidence relevant to a question. Reviewers use pre-defined methods to minimize bias and assess the extent of the evidence to provide a basis that could inform further research and synthesis.

Source: Collaboration for Environmental Evidence.

Reviews

  • Effects of forest management on biodiversity
  • Value of small habitat patches for biodiversity
  • Ecosystem services valuation
  • Forest habitats and Natura
  • Ecosystem services vs. wood sales
  • Barriers for fish passage
  • Water protection and forestry
  • Sustainability image of forestry
  • Water impacts of peatland forestry
  • Drivers of certification
  • Climate change and boreal forest species

News

Updated information concerning the project is posted in the News. In this section you may also find information of the events.

News and events

Hunting for grey literature

1.2.2019

One of the significant differences between a systematic and non-systematic (i.e. traditional) literature review is that during a systematic review process information is searched also within grey literature that has not been peer-reviewed. In … Lue lisää...

Insights from the stakeholder workshop guide the review

9.11.2018

In our second stakeholder workshop we moved from the impacts of different forest management regimes to conservation practices used in production forests. There was a balanced participation from different stakeholder groups, and the discussion around … Lue lisää...

What do we mean when we talk about evidence?

2.10.2018

At the first stakeholder workshop we got a question about the name of the project, specifically on the use of the word evidence. Based on the discussion that followed, evidence and evidence-based are words that are understood in multiple ways. For a … Lue lisää...

More articles

For more information

Sini Savilaakso, Metsäteho Oy


The Finnish Forest Foundation is funding the Evidence-Based Forestry in Finland project.

Copyright© 2021 Metsäteho Oy